Drawing for MUSICBASE

USPTO serial 73770630

MUSICBASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1700214Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 14, 1992
Examiner
JUDGE, CONNIE M.
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MUSICBASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lesia Skrypoczka

Lesia Skrypoczka Clear Channel Communications, Inc.200 East Basse RoadSAN ANTONIO, TX 78209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTERIZED DATA BASE STORED ON COMPUTER DISK CONTAINING INFORMATION REGARDING POPULAR MUSICSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 14, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2025ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 27, 2023CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 14, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 4, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 21, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 26, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 5, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 4, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 23, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 3, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2012RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Apr 3, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 28, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 6, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 2009CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 16, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2002RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 6, 200289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 6, 2002PR89RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9—
May 6, 20028.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
May 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2002PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jan 25, 200289AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Sep 30, 1998C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 10, 1998815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 14, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 21, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 11, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 1989CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 22, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance