USPTO serial 73771192
DYNAMIC...INNOVATIVE...RESPONSIVE THAT'SWHAT MAKES NUPLA BETTER THAN THE "STONE AGE" COMPETITION!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1581084Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 1990
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAMIC...INNOVATIVE...RESPONSIVE THAT'SWHAT MAKES NUPLA BETTER THAN THE "STONE AGE" COMPETITION!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT W. KELLEY
SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY BAUERSFELD LOWRY & KELLEY LLP6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PNEUMATIC HOT LINE CUTTERS | EXPIRED | — |
| 008 | HAND TOOLS AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY SHOVELS, SPADES, SCOOPS, POST HOLE DIGGERS, PICKS, MATTOCKS, RAKES, HOES, SCRAPERS, FORKS, ASPHALT LUTES, CONCRETE PLACERS, TAMPERS, SOIL PROBES, PICK POLES, PROP POLES, PIKE POLES, HOOK POLES, HOOKS, DIGGING BARS, BANK BLADES, BOLT CUTTERS, HAMMERS, MALLETS, HAND HELD HOLDERS, NAMELY IMPACT HEAD HOLDERS, SOFT FACE TIPS, MAULS, WEDGES, AXES, MANUALLY OPERATED HOT LINE CUTTERS, FIRE SWATTERS, AND SOLID AND TUBULAR FIBERGLASS TOOL HANDLES AND KITS CONSISTING OF REPLACEMENT HANDLES AND FASTENERS FOR HAND TOOLS | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NUPLA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NUPLA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NUPLA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NUPLA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC...INNOVATIVE...RESPONSIVE THAT'SWHAT MAKES NUPLA BETTER THAN THE "STONE AGE" COMPETITION!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | 9.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 14, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |