USPTO serial 73771953
COVERPLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COVERPLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RUNCORN, CHESHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELVILLE OWEN
MELVILLE OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CONSUMABLES, NAMELY, CHEMICALS AND STAINS FOR USE IN RELATION TO IMMUNOSTAINING DEVICES, INSTRUMENTS AND APPARATUS; CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR USE IN LIFE SCIENCE LABORATORIES; STAINS, REAGENTS, ANTI-SERA AND CONJUGATES AND SIMILAR CHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE VISUALZATION OF ELECTROPHORETIC RESULTS; CELLULOSE ACETATE, AGAROSE, POLYACRYLAMIDE AND OTHER POLAR OR NON-POLAR MATERIALS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THE ELECTROPHORETIC MEDIA; PACKING MATERIALS AND FILLING MATERIALS FOR USE IN CHROMATOGRAPHY INCLUDING CHEMICAL PRODUCTS CONSISTING OF OR CONTAINING SILICA IN LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |