USPTO serial 73772257
3D VIDEOLASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 3D VIDEOLASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LABEGE INNOPOLE CEDEX, FR
LEBEGE INNOPOLE CEDX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIRGINIA S. TAYLOR
VIRGINIA S TAYLOR KILPATRICK & CODY3100 EQUITABLE BLDG100 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30043Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEMS COMPRISING LASERS, COMPUTERS WITH SIGNAL PROCESSING CARDS, DIGITIZERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND INTERFACES, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO RECORDERS, VIDEO MONITORS, ROBOTS, TRANSLATION TABLES, HORIZONTAL TURNTABLES, FORMS CONTROLLERS, CONTROL RACKS, CALIBRATION CHARTS AND PRINTED DOCUMENTATION, SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | DIGITAL IMAGING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY COMBINATIONS OF LASERS, COMPUTERS WITH SIGNAL PROCESSING CARDS, DIGITIZERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND INTERFACES, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO RECORDERS, VIDEO MONITORS, ROBOTS, TRANSLATION TABLES, HORIZONTAL TURNTABLES, FORMS CONTROLLERS, CONTROL RACKS, CALIBRATION CHARTS AND PRINTED DOCUMENTATION ACCOMPANYING THE FOREGOING | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | MEDICAL DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEMS COMPRISING LASERS, COMPUTERS WITH SIGNAL PROCESSING CARDS, DIGITIZERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND INTERFACES, VIDEO CAMERAS, VIDEO RECORDERS, VIDEO MONITORS, ROBOTS, TRANSLATION TABLES, HORIZONTAL TURNTABLES, FORMS, CONTROLLERS, CONTROL RACKS, CALIBRATION CHARTS AND PRINTED DOCUMENTATION, SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION OF DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INVOLVING THE USE OF DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VISION 3D, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by XAO SYSTEMES
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named 3D VIDEOLASER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |