Drawing for SKINNY NATURAL CORN CHIPS

USPTO serial 73772527

SKINNY NATURAL CORN CHIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1589176Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 1990
Examiner
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKINNY NATURAL CORN CHIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard B. Biagi

Richard B. Biagi Neal & McDevitt, LLC1776 Ash StreetNorthfield, IL 60093UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CORN CHIPSEXPIREDMay 25, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Sep 14, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 11, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2001RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 27, 200189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 22, 200089AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Jul 19, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 26, 1996815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 27, 1990R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 2, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 26, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 28, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance