USPTO serial 73773072
CASTOLIN EUTECTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASTOLIN EUTECTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY P. LAPOINTE
GREGORY P LAPOINTE BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, PCSTE 1201900 CHAPEL STNEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL FLUX COMPOSITIONS FOR USE IN WELDING, BRAZING, AND SOLDERING OPERATIONS, EITHER TO BE APPLIED TO METAL SURFACES OR TO WELDING RODS | ABANDONED | — |
| 006 | METAL ALLOYS IN THE FORM OF POWDER AND SOLIDS FOR USE IN WELDING, BRAZING AND SOLDERING OPERATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | INCANDESCENT WELDERS, SPARK WELDERS AND ARC WELDERS; GUNS FOR PLASMA SPRAYING INCLUDING JETS, TIPS AND NOSE PIPES FOR USE IN CONJUCTION THEREWITH; SAFETY HELMETS FOR USE IN WELDING, BRAZING AND SOLDERING OPERATIONS; WELDING ELECTRODES, CONSUMABLE ELECTRODES; AND APPARATUS FOR USE IN WELDING, BRAZING AND SOLDERING OPERATIONS, NAMELY, ACETYLENE TORCHES, WELDING HEADS AND THERMAL SPRAY DIFFUSERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | ELECTRIC APPARATUS USED IN WELDING, SOLDERING AND BRAZING PROCESSES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC RESISTANCE WELDING AND ARC WELDING APPARATUS | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE, RENOVATION AND/OR REPAIR OF METALLIC AND/OR SYNTHETIC SURFACES OF MACHINES AND APPLIANCES INCLUDING TURBINE BLADES, BORING TOOLS, CUTTERS AND OTHER PARTS AND FITTINGS OF SUCH MACHINES OR APPLIANCES; PLATING, COATING, SHAPING AND WELDING SURFACES | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING SERVICES, ALL RELATING TO FAULT/TREATMENT DIAGNOSIS, MAINTENANCE, RENOVATION AND/OR REPAIR OFINSTALLATIONS, MACHINES OR APPLIANCES AND OF PARTS AND FITTINGS OF INSTALLATIONS, MACHINES OR APPLIANCES; ALL RELATING TO PLATING, COATING, SHAPING AND TO WELDING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CASTOLIN S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by EUTECTIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CASTOLIN EUTECTIC
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |