USPTO serial 73773401
DDS DIGITAL DATA STORAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 1995
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DDS DIGITAL DATA STORAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHINAGAWA-KU, TOKYO, JP
SHINAGAWA-KU, TOKYO, JP
SHINAGAWA-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIGITAL TAPE RECORDERS AND/OR PLAYERS WHICH STORE DATA, BLANK TAPES, AND PRE-RECORDED TAPES FOR USE OF STORAGE OF DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SONY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SONY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SONY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DDS DIGITAL DATA STORAGE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |