USPTO serial 73773487
PURE DATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 1991
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURE DATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO L4B 1B4
RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIDNEY WYNTON SEMPLE
LISA LOADER ZAMMIT DASH & SEMPLEBARRISTERS & SOLICITORS130 BLOOR ST W STE 601TORONTO, ON M5S 1N5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY MEMORY EXPANSION UNITS, PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS FOR ENABLING COMPUTERS TO INTERFACE WITH OTHER COMPUTERS AND DEVICES IN LOCAL AREA NETWORKS AND ACTIVE AND PASSIVE HUBS FOR USE IN LOCAL AREA NETWORKS TOGETHER WITH INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD WITH SUCH GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 6, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE DATA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by WILDCARD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE DATA LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE DATA LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PURE DATA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 14, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |