USPTO serial 73773694
Serial No. 73773694
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 73773694?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HILLERSTORP, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADRIENNE L. WHITE, ESQ.
ADRIENNE L WHITE ESQ BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISWASHINGTON & PRINCE STSTHE GEORGE MASON BLDG P O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | VEHICLE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY ROOF RACKS IN THE FORM OF LOAD CARRIERS, SKI CARRIERS, SAILBOARD CARRIERS, KAYAK CARRIERS, BOAT CARRIERS, LUGGAGE CARRIERS, AND BIKE CARRIERS; VEHICLE ROOF CARGO BOXES; TRAILER SPOILERS; AND QUICK STRAPS, LUGGAGE FASTENERS, AND ADJUSTABLE LOAD STOPS FOR USE IN FASTENING LUGGAGE AND LOADS TO VEHICLES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |