USPTO serial 73774177
GRADEMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRADEMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KITCHENER, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. DAY
JOSEPH A DAY GOWLING & HENDERSONSTE 110050 QUEEN ST NKITCHENER, ON N2H 6M1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | WHEELED CONSTRUCTION MACHINES, NAMELY GRADERS AND LAND-LEVELLERS FOR USE IN ROAD BUILDING, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |