USPTO serial 73774826
EVERBLADES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 1989
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EVERBLADES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
REDDING, CA
SACRAMENTO, CA
SACRAMENTO, CA
SACRAMENTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE J. BIELEN, JR.
THEODORE J BIELEN JR BIELEN PETERSON & LAMPE1990 N CALIFORNIA BLVD STE 720WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | HEATED WINDSHIELD WIPER BLADES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MILLER, WILLIAM N.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHERN COMPANY INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHERN COMPANY INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by NORTHERN COMPANY INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named EVERBLADES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2015 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |