USPTO serial 73775009
BIMBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIMBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN L. WELCH
JOHN L WELCH WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE, PERFUME, COLOGNE, TOILET WATER, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, LIPSTICK, BLUSHER, EYELINER, ROUGE, MAKE-UP PENCILS, MAKE-UP POWDER, HAIR GELS, HAIR SHAMPOO, DENTIFRICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS SOLD IN BULK AND GOODS IN PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CLASSES, JEWELRY, PRECIOUS STONES | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | POCKET MIRRORS, TOILET MIRRORS, MAGNIFYING MIRRORS, AND TRAVEL MIRRORS | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | COMBS AND HAIR BRUSHES, TOILET BAGS, RAZORS, AND SHAVING BRUSHES, MAKE-UP BOXES, PERFUME SPRAYERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | HAIR PRODUCTS, NAMELY HAIR BANDS, SIDE COMBS, CLIPS AND BARRETTES, EYELETS FOR CLOTHING, HAIRPINS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, NEEDLES, ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JACQUES SOUSTIEL, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named BIMBA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |