USPTO serial 73776146
DYNARAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1578724Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 1990
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNARAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CAMBRIDGE, MA
CAMBRIDGE, MA
CAMBRIDGE, MA
WESTBROOK, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER L. COSTAS
G ANDREW BARGER LEGAL DEPT 4B-36THOMAS & BETTS CORP8155 T & B BLVDMEMPHIS, TN 38125Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SELF-POWERED EMERGENCY LIGHTING UNITS, EXIT SIGNS & REMOTE EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURES | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRO POWERPACS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRO POWERPACS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRO POWERPACS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by EMERGI-LITE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DYNARAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 1999 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | 9.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |