Drawing for LUCY'S

USPTO serial 73777454

LUCY'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARKS, MARTIN H.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUCY'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FELIX L. D'ARIENZO

FELIX L D'ARIENZO KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESABANDONEDJan 7, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 20, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 25, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 26, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 26, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 1990UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance