USPTO serial 73777725
DELICIAS DE MEXICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, RON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELICIAS DE MEXICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL A. FRANK
MITCHELL A FRANK CPC INTERNATIONAL INCP O BOX 8000INTERNATIONAL PLZENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, NJ 07632Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | MEXICAN-STYLE ENTREE SEASONING MIXES USED IN THE PREPARATION OF TACOS, ENCHILADAS, CHILI, PICADILLO, AND ADOBO | ABANDONED | Aug 9, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |