USPTO serial 73779035
ADPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ, JEFFERY SCHWAAB, MACK, ET ALP O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | KEYKBOARDS FOR DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 20, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 29, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |