USPTO serial 73779587
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J.T. MARTIN
J T MARTIN1700 H ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SUBMARINE SANDWICHES FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | ABANDONED | Nov 22, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |