USPTO serial 73779984
HYDRAFIRM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYDRAFIRM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARCELLA ANN STAPOR
MARCELLA ANN STAPOR REVLON, INC625 MADISON AVE16TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | INGREDIENT USED IN FACIAL TREATMENT PREPARATIONS | ABANDONED | Jan 27, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |