USPTO serial 73780087
QUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
REXDALE, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. PARR
RICHARD J PARRSCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST WSTE 4000 BOX 401TORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | OFFICE FURNITURE NAMELY SYSTEMS FURNITURE CONSISTING OF INDIVIDUALLY CONNECTED PANELS AND WORK SURFACES, FILING, STORAGE AND SHELVING COMPONENTS, AND ACCESSORIES, WHICH WHEN COMBINED, FORM COMPLETE WORK STATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |