USPTO serial 73781191
SPEEDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEEDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN R. GREENSTEIN
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN BAKER & MCKENZIE660 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL STONE, CEMENT, LIME, MORTAR, PLASTER, GRAVEL, PIPES OF EARTHENWARE OR CEMENT, ASPHALT, PITCH, BITUMEN, STONE MONUMENTS, CHEMNEY POTS; PORTALBLE BUILDINGS FOR PERSONAL AND BUSINESS USE; ALABASTER, ALABASTER GLASS, ASBESTOS CEMENT, ASBESTOS MORTAR, AVIARIES, BATH SUBICLES, WOOD BEAMS, BINDING AGENTS FOR MAKING BRIQUETS, FELT, FIBERBOARD, FLAGSTONE, FLOOR BOARDS, FURNACE LININGS, BRICKS, SAFETY AND WINDOW GLASS, GLASS TILES, GLASS PANELS, TIMBER, POULTRY HOUSES, CLAY, COAL TAR, BUILDING MATERIAL COATINGS, CONCRETE, CONCRET BLOCKS, CORK, CORNICES, CRASHBARREERS FOR ROADS, DIVING BOARDS, DOCKS, DOOR CASINGS, DOOR FRAMES, DOOR PANELS, DOORS, DRAIN PIPES, EARTH FOR BRICKS, FELT, FENCES, FIRE CLAY, FLOORING, FOUNDRY MOLDS, GATES, GIRDEERS, GRAVESTONES, GREENHOUSES, GROUT, JOISTS, GUTTERS, GYPSUM, HARDBORD, HOMES, LIMSTONE, LUMIOUS PAVING, MACADAM, MAGNESIA CEMENT, MANTLE PIECES, MARBLE, MANHOLE COVERS, MASTS, MEMORIAL PLAQUES, LUMBER, INSTALLATIONS FOR PARKING BICYCLES, PERCHES, PIGSTYES, PITCH, WOODEN PLANKS FOR BUILDING, CORKS, RAILROAD TIES, ROAD COATIG MATERIALS,, ROCK CRYSTAL, ROCKET LAUNCHING PLATFORMS, ROOFING, SAND, SANDSTONE, SCAFFOLDING, SEALANTS, SHOWER STALLS, SHUTTERS, SILICA, SILOS, SINKS, SKATING RINKS, SLAGSTONE, SLATE, STABLES, STAINED-GLASS WINDOWS, STAIRCASES, SIMMING POOLS, TELEPHONE BOOTHS, TEERA COTTA, TILES, TILE FLOORINGS, PLYWOOD, SKYLIGHTS, SLIDING DOORS, STONE, WALL BOARD AND WALL TILES, TOMBS, TIMBER, TRELLISES, TOMBSTONES, VENEER WOOD, WINDOW FRAMES, VENEERS, GRANITE, WOOD MOULDINGS, PANELLING, PAVING STONES, SHINGLES, SIDING, CHIMNEY PARTS, LATTICE WORK, BURIAL VAULTS AND XYLOLITHS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |