USPTO serial 73781203
SPEEDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1770965Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 1993
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPEEDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1016 BS AMSTERDAM, NL
1016 BS AMSTERDAM, NL
1016 BS AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN R. GREENSTEIN
AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | AFTERSHAVE LOTION; BABY OIL; BATH SALTS; BATH GEL; BATH OIL; BATH POWDER; BODY LOTION; BODY OIL; BODY POWDER; BODY SPLASH; BREATH SPRAY; BUBBLE BATH; COLD CREAM; COLOGNE; EAU DE COLOGNE; ELECTRIC PRE-SHAVE LOTION; EMERY BOARDS; EMERY CLOTH; EMERY PAPER; EYE MAKE UP REMOVER; EYE SHADOW; EYELINER; FACE POWDER; FOUNDATION MAKE-UP; ADHESIVE FOR AFFIXING FALSE EYELASHES; FALSE EYELASHES; FALSE NAILS; HAIR CONDITIONER; HAIR COLORANTS; HAIR DYES; HAIR LIGHTENER; HAIR RINSE; HAIR SHAMPOO; HAIR SPRAY; HAIR LOTIONS; HAIR WAVING PREPARATIONS; LIPSTICK; LIP GLOSS; LIQUID SOAP FOR HANDS AND BODY; MAKE-UP POWDER; MAKE-UP REMOVING PREPARATIONS; MASCARA; MASSAGE OIL; MOUTHWASH; MUSTACHE WAX; NAIL HARDENER; NAIL POLISH BASE COAT; NAIL POLISH REMOVER; NAIL POLISH TOP COAT; NAIL POLISH; PETROLEUM JELLY FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; PERFUMES; SHAVING CREAM; SHOWER GEL; SKIN CLEANSER CREAM; SKIN MOISTURIZER; SUN-TANNING CREAMS, LOTIONS, AND OILS; TALCUM POWDER; AND TOOTHPASTE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |