USPTO serial 73781449
AIRLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
REXDALE, ONTARIO M9W 1P7, CA
REXDALE, ONTARIO M9W 1P7, CA
REXDALE, ONTARIO M9W 1P7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. ROGER HART
H ROGER HART ROGERS, BERESKIN & PARRBOX 40140 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PACKAGING MATERIALS FOR PACKING; NAMELY, PAPER AND CARDBOARD LINED WITH MULTICELLULAR LAMINATED BUBBLE MATERIAL | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | PLASTIC PACKING IN THE NATURE OF MULTICELLULAR LAMINATED BUBBLE MATERIALS FOR SHIPPING CONTAINERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | COMMERCIAL PLASTIC PACKAGING CONTAINERS LINED WITH MULTICELLULAR LAMINATED BUBBLE MATERIAL | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POLYAIR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by POLYAIR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CANTAR INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named AIRLITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |