CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CRYOMAX

USPTO serial 73782188

CRYOMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1662127Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 29, 1991
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CRYOMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. HAROLD NISSEN

J HAROLD NISSEN MCAULAY FISHER NISSEN & GOLDBERG261 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001AMMONIA FOR INDUSTRIAL USE, OLEFINS AND DERIVATIVES FOR INDUSTRIAL USESECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
004ETHANE, ETHYLENE, LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS (LPG); NAMELY, PROPANE, BUTENE, PROPYLENE, BUTANE, METHANOL, ALL FOR USE AS RAW MATERIALS FOR SYNTHESIS AND FOR USE AS FUELSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
011INDUSTRIAL PLANTS FOR THE EXTRACTION AND PRODUCTION OF ETHANE, ETHYLENE AND LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS (LPG) COMPRISED OF DISTILLATION TOWERS, WASH TOWERS, EVAPORATOR TOWERS, EXTRACTION TOWERS, DEGASSING TOWERS, FLASH TOWERS, FRACTIONATING TOWERS, BUBBLE TOWERS, SCRUBBER TOWERS, STRIPPING TOWERS, RECTIFICATION TOWERS, CATALYTIC TOWERS, SPRAY TOWERS, PACKED TOWERS, TOPPING AND FRACTIONATING TOWERS, DEBUTANIZER TOWERS, DEPROPANIZER TOWERS AND VACUUM TOWERS; COLUMNS; NAMELY, ABSORPTION COLUMNS, BAFFLE COLUMNS; HYDROGENATING PLANTS, CRACKING PLANTS, GASOLINE PLANTS, DEWAXING PLANTS, DESULFURIZING PLANTS, SWEETENING PLANTS; BOILERS, HEAT EXCHANGERS, REHEATERS, FLASH BOILERS, STEAM BOILERS, FURNACES, CHIMNEYS, STACKS, CATALYTIC AND CHEMICAL REACTORSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
042ENGINEERING SERVICES, DRAFTING SERVICES, OIL PROSPECTING AND OIL WELL DRILLING SERVICES, MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES, LABORATORY RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OIL, DESIGNING COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF OILSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 1998C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 29, 1991R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 21, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 10, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance