USPTO serial 73782586
THE SECOND GENERATION FELV VACCINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE SECOND GENERATION FELV VACCINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD H. ZARLEY
DONALD H ZARLEY ZARLEY, MCKEE, THOMTE, VOORHEES & SEASE2400 RUAN CTRDES MOINES, IA 50309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | FELINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS VACCINE, FELINE RHINOTRACHEITIS VIRUS VACCINE; AND FELINE CALICVIRUS VIRUS VACCINE | ABANDONED | Aug 18, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |