USPTO serial 73782640
HEROQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEROQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLIOT A. SALTER
ELLIOT A SALTER SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | ROLE PLAYING GAME MAGAZINES, BOOKS AND MANUALS; RULE BOOKS FOR PLAYING GAMES; STATIONERY ITEMS - NAMELY, BALL-POINT AND INK PENS, WRITING AND DRAWING INKS, PAINT BRUSHES, STATIONERY FOLDERS, NOTEPADS, SCORE SHEETS AND WRITING PAPER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1989 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |