USPTO serial 73783466
LA BOMBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1587399Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 1990
- Examiner
- BYERS, KRISTEN S.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA BOMBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Springboro, OH
SPECIALTY XHEMICAL RESOURCES, INC
MACEDONIA, OH
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT M. OLDHAM
Hi-Port Aerosol, Inc.9055 S. Freeway DriveMacedonia, OH 44056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | INSECTICIDES, NAMELY, ROACH AND INSECT FOGGER FOR HOUSEHOLD USE | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by King Internatinal, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SPECIALTY XHEMICAL RESOURCES, INC
- Other trademarks owned by JOHNSON CHEMICAL CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHNSON CHEMICAL CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHNSON CHEMICAL CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named LA BOMBA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 6, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 21, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |