USPTO serial 73783702
REPLENISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REPLENISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. DEGRANDI
JOSEPH A DEGRANDI BEVERIDGE, DEGRANDI & WEILACHER1850 M ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | DAIRY PRODUCTS NAMELY MILK, YOGURT, COTTAGE CHEESE, SOUR CREAM | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |