USPTO serial 73783883
THE ORIGINAL OATMEAL BAKING CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 1990
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL OATMEAL BAKING CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. LITMAN, ESQUIRE
RICHARD C LITMAN ESQ CRYSTAL CITY STATIONLITMAN LAW OFFICE LTDP O BOX 15035ARLINGTON, VA 22215-0035Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BAKED GOODS; NAMELY BREADS, ROLLS, MUFFINS, BREAKFAST CEREAL AND PROCESSED GRAIN MIXES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 12, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 9, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |