USPTO serial 73783885
THE ORIGINAL OATMEAL BAKING CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 1991
- Examiner
- APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL OATMEAL BAKING CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. LITMAN
RICHARD C LITMAN CRYSTAL CITY STATIONP O BOX 15035ARLINGTON, VA 22215-0035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BAKED GOODS; NAMELY, BREADS, ROLLS, MUFFINS, PROCESSED CEREAL AND PROCESSED GRAIN MIXES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 18, 1991 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 30, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |