Drawing for Serial No. 73784496

USPTO serial 73784496

Serial No. 73784496

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARKS, MARTIN H.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73784496?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VIRGIL W. YOUNG, JR.

VIRGIL W YOUNG JR HALE, WARD YOUNG, GREEN & NIXON628 W BROADWAYSTE 300NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCEABANDONEDJul 1, 1985
038TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT LEASING SERVICESABANDONEDJul 1, 1985
042DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT FIELDABANDONEDJul 1, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 1990PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 7, 1990PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 23, 1990PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 1990PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 1990NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jun 13, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance