USPTO serial 73784735
IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Kolakowski III
WILLIAM F KOLAKOWSKI III DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC39577 WOODWARD AVE STE 300BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROPROCESSOR BASED HAND HELD APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING AND ORDERING GEARING CONFIGURATIONS [ AND INSTRUCTIONS AND USER MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 7, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMO INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IMO DELAVAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IMO DELAVAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IMO DELAVAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IT
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 1996 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |