USPTO serial 73785042
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LAWRENCE BURNS (INSTRUMENTS) LTD.
AYLESBURY, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE HP19 3BF, GB
LAWRENCE BURNS (INSTRUMENTS) LTD.
AYLESBURY, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE HP19 3BF, GB
LAWRENCE BURNS (INSTRUMENTS) LTD.
AYLESBURY, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE HP19 3BF, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANIK MAROVICI
JANIK MAROVICI PERMAN & GREEN LLP99 HAWLEY AVENUESTRATFORD, CT 06614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR STATIC CONTROL OR ELIMINATION AND/OR DUST REMOVAL CLEANING GUNS, FILTERS, ANTI-STATIC BARS, AIR BLOWERS, POWER MODULES, AND POWER TRANSFORMERS; AND PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL OF THE AFORESAID GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS FOR STATIC CONTROL OR ELIMINATION AND DUST CONTROL COMPRISING AIR IONIZING CLEANING GUNS, DUST FILTERS, ANTI-STATIC BARS, IONIZING AIR BLOWERS, POWER MODULES AND POWER TRANSFORMERS, AND PARTS THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 6, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |