USPTO serial 73785143
HAIRBANZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 1991
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HAIRBANZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LAKE WORTH, FL
LAKE WORTH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN D. ANDERSON
PHYLLIS FREEDLANDER C/O HAIRBANZ, INC3599 23RD AVE S STE 6LAKE WORTH, FL 33414UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | HAIR WEAR; NAMELY, PONYTAIL HOLDERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1991 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |