Drawing for ROYAL HARVEST

USPTO serial 73785404

ROYAL HARVEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL HARVEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STANLEY E. JOHNSON

STANLEY E JOHNSON PERLEY-ROBERTSON, PANET, ET AL99 BANK ST8TH FLOTTAWA, ON K1P 6C1

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING ADVICE AND CONSULTATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF FISH FARMSABANDONED—
037PROVIDING ADVICE AND CONSULTATION IN THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FISH FARMABANDONED—
042PROVIDING ADVICE AND CONSULTATION AS TO FISH FARMS, SEAFOOD, FISH, AQUACULTURE AND BIOLOGY CONCERNING FISHABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 14, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 4, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 22, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance