USPTO serial 73785940
SPEZIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1761058Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 1993
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPEZIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM L. ANDROLIA
WILLIAM L ANDROLIA KODA AND ANDROLIA10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2340LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PLUS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PLUS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PLUS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named SPEZIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |