USPTO serial 73786687
M F C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M F C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PONT DE L'ARCHE (EURE), FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN SMOLOWITZ
TWO PENNSYLVANIA PLZSTE 1500NEW YORK, NY 10121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYE GLASS LENS SHAPE REPRODUCTIONS MACHINERY, NAMELY, LENS GRINDING, EDGE FORMATION, CONTOUR SHAPING, AND EDGE GROOVE FORMATION MACHINES; EYE GLASS LENS SHAPE MEASUREMENT AND DIMENSION RECORDATION MACHINES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |