Drawing for ERTE

USPTO serial 73786768

ERTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1616396Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 1990
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ERTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel Bldg.SCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL SCULPTURESACTIVESep 30, 1980
016GRAPHIC ART PRINTS, SILK SCREEN PRINTS, POSTERSACTIVEAug 28, 1982
020MIRRORS, PICTURE FRAMESACTIVEAug 15, 1986
021DECORATIVE STAINED GLASS PANELS, PORCELAIN SCULPTURES, DECORATIVE BOXES, VASES, GLASS BOWLS, DECORATIVE PLATES, CANDLE HOLDERS, SERVING TRAYS, DECANTERS, PITCHERSACTIVEApr 30, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 6, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 9, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 10, 2020NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2020RNL3REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 10, 202089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 10, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 30, 2020E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 18, 2010RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 18, 201089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 18, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 12, 201089AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Oct 12, 2010E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2001RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 29, 200189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 5, 2001PR89RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9—
Mar 6, 2001PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Oct 6, 200089AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Aug 13, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 6, 1996CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jan 19, 1996815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 7, 1995PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 9, 1990R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 17, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 1990DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 23, 1990DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 1989CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance