USPTO serial 73787468
CARLA ROBERTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARLA ROBERTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BUENOS AIRES, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. HAROLD NISSEN, ESQ.
J HAROLD NISSEN ESQ MCAULAY, FISHER, NISSEN, ET AL261 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, WALLETS, SUITCASES, HANDBAGS, BRIEFCASES AND CARRY ON BAGS MADE OF LEATHER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |