USPTO serial 73787710
ROMAN SPRINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROMAN SPRINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RICHMOND HILL, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | SPRING WATERS; MINERAL WATERS AND CARBONATED WATERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |