USPTO serial 73787722
LUGGAGE LABEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1597972Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 1990
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUGGAGE LABEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TA-YA HSIANG, TAICHUNG HSIEN, TW
TA-YA HSIANG, TAICHUNG HSIEN, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY & NEIMARK624 9TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER SOLD IN BULK AND IMITATION LEATHER SOLD IN BULK; DUFFEL BAGS; CARRY-ON BAGS; SHOULDER BAGS; SPORTS BAGS FOR ALL PURPOSES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2005 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 22, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 29, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 29, 1997 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 22, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 7, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |