USPTO serial 73788845
NIMBUS CD4X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSENBURGH, ELISSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIMBUS CD4X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. SUTTON
JOHN P SUTTON LIMBACH, LIMBACH & SUTTON2001 FERRY BLDGSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, ALL FOR THE RECORDAL, STORAGE AND/OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND, DATA AND/OR VIDEO SIGNALS; NAMELY BLANK AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES, CASSETTE TAPES, AND DISCS, ALL FOR THE STORAGE OF SOUND, DATA AND/OR VIDEO SIGNALS; AND PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |