USPTO serial 73789732
AGRISOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGRISOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Z. PETER SAWICKI
Z PETER SAWICKI KINNEY & LANGESTE 1500625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING ACCESS TIME TO COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF FARMING AND CROP MANAGEMENT | ABANDONED | Nov 13, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 1, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |