USPTO serial 73789924
VICTORIANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VICTORIANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CENTER FOR HOUSEWARES DESIGN, THE
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT W. KELLEY
SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY, BAUERSFELD & LOWRY6320 CANOGA AVESTE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | UTILITY PAILS; FLORAL PLANTERS; PLASTIC MUGS; TUMBLERS; ICE BUCKETS; PITCHERS; SERVING TRAYS; WOODEN PANTRYWARE; STORAGE CONTAINERS; PLANTER BOXES; GLASSWARE; NAPKIN RINGS; TABLE ROUNDS AND SQUARES; STORAGE JARS; DUST PANS; SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS; SERVING PLATTERS; PLATES; PITCHERS; TEAPOTS; MUGS; DISHES; BURNER COVERS; JARS AND THERMAL CARAFES | ABANDONED | Dec 13, 1988 |
| 024 | PLACEMATS; NAPKINS; CURTAINS AND CURTAIN COVERINGS; TABLECLOTHS; AND SHOWER CURTAINS; AND OVER THE COUNTER FABRIC PIECE GOODS | ABANDONED | Dec 5, 1988 |
| 027 | CARPETS, RUGS AND MATS | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |