Drawing for MICRO SERGER

USPTO serial 73789926

MICRO SERGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRO SERGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY C. SMITH

GREGORY C SMITH PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT, ET AL1177 W LOOP STENTH FLHOUSTON, TX 77027-9095

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007HEAVYDUTY CUTTING ATTACHMENT FOR SEWING MACHINESABANDONEDDec 15, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 29, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 19, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 20, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance