USPTO serial 73790675
DOKMAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOKMAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WHITMAN BENN & ASSOCIATES LIMITED
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANET R. WESTROM
JANET R WESTROM MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | FLOATABLE APPARATUS FOR CONSTRUCTING THEREON SEAWALLS AND DOCKS, NAMELY FORMING FLOATS, STABILIZER FLOATS AND SUPPORTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |