USPTO serial 73790943
PRO MOTION THIRST QUENCHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, SHARON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO MOTION THIRST QUENCHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD LOCK PURNELL RAIN & HARRELL2200 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SHIRTS AND HATS SOLD TO PROMOTE A THIRST-QUENCHING BEVERAGE | ABANDONED | Feb 13, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |