Drawing for PRO MOTION THIRST QUENCHER

USPTO serial 73790943

PRO MOTION THIRST QUENCHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARSH, SHARON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO MOTION THIRST QUENCHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MOLLY BUCK RICHARD

MOLLY BUCK RICHARD LOCK PURNELL RAIN & HARRELL2200 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025SHIRTS AND HATS SOLD TO PROMOTE A THIRST-QUENCHING BEVERAGEABANDONEDFeb 13, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 8, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 14, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 7, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 8, 1990DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 26, 1990DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 1990DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance