USPTO serial 73791289
CUPRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUPRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES F. MCKEOWN
JAMES F MCKEOWN ANTONELLI, TERRY & WANDSSTE 6001919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC GAMES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMES FOR AMUSEMENTS PURPOSES, CASSETTES, CARTRIDGES, FLOPPY DISCS; EDUCATIONAL TOYS AND APPARATUS; AND PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | ELECTRONIC GAMES AND COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; BOARD GAMES AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |