Drawing for SHINING TIME STATION

USPTO serial 73791358

SHINING TIME STATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOEGELI, JAMES F.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHINING TIME STATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041BROADCAST OF A SERIES OF TELEVISION PROGRAMSABANDONEDJan 28, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 5, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 1990DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 9, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 1989DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance