USPTO serial 73791510
WHITE GLOVE CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHITE GLOVE CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. LLOYD SARGINSON
C LLC SARGINSONSCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST WSTE 4000 BOX 401TORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CLEANING AND REPAIRING DOMESTIC, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL CHIMNEYS AND SMOKESTACKS, INSTALLING CHIMNEY CAPS AND CHIMNEY TOP ENCLOSURES FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHIMNEYS FROM RAIN, RODENTS AND THE PREVENTION OF FREE FLYING SPARKS FROM CHIMNEYS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |