Drawing for WE'VE CREATED THE FUTURE BEFORE

USPTO serial 73791653

WE'VE CREATED THE FUTURE BEFORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE'VE CREATED THE FUTURE BEFORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NEAL S. GREENFIELD

NEAL S GREENFIELD SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PATENT MANAGEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PATENT AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY CONSULTANT SERVICESABANDONEDJan 23, 1989
042CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFERABANDONEDJan 23, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 13, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 1990REINREINSTATED—
Feb 13, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance